A new topic on popular game forum Reddit recently sparked heated discussions, and it actually received more than 1,400 replies. The topic is that game reviews are becoming increasingly unreliable, because the same game is often evaluated for masterpieces and feces. I don’t know whether it is good or bad if I don’t play it.

·Players listed works by Obsidian Studio, such as "Outside World", whose ratings on M Station are not very "unified". As of the latest data, 60% praises, 17% bad reviews, and the remaining 23% are difficult to mix.

Of course, the comprehensive positive review rate that just passed the qualification cannot make players who are hesitating to buy the game directly make up their minds. After all, apart from overwhelmingly good or bad reviews, such as games always have a lot to do with the player's personal preferences, and it is not easy to be reliable.