The method of the original author Azure Tianwei:
First assumption: Efficiency is expressed in V, specifications are expressed in A, and the number of adjacent uranium is represented by N
What is the number of adjacent uranium?
As shown in the figure:
For ①, there are 4 uranium near it; for ②, only one is adjacent to it.
This is the number of adjacent uranium
Continue to set: Single Uranium -V = 1 A = 1 Dual Uranium -V = 2 A = 2 Four Creed Uranium -V = 3 A = 4
Heat formula: 2A [(v+n) 2 +v+n]
Example:
Analysis: There are 1 adjacent to the monocycal uranium, two adjacent to the double -recastic uranium, and 1 adjacent to the tetrauminum uranium
Then: The calories emitted by single -connected uranium are: 2x1x [(1+1) 2 +1+1] = 12
The calories emitted by dual -linked uranium are: 2x2x [(2+2) 2 +2+2] = 80
The calories emitted by the four -colored uranium are: 2x4x [(3+1) 2 +3+1] = 160
The total heat is 12+80+160 = 252
Power generation formula: 5A (V+N)
Example:
Analysis: Like the above analysis
Calculation: Single -connected uranium power generation: 5x1x (1+1) = 10
Double -connected uranium power generation: 5x2x (2+2) = 40
Four -connected uranium power generation: 5x4x (3+1) = 80
Total power 10+40+80 = 130
MOX characteristic: the higher the temperature of the reactor, the greater the power generation
MOX fever is the same as ordinary uranium, and MOX fever does not change with changes with the heap temperature
MOX power generation formula (verified): 5A (V+N) (1+4X reactor temperature/reactor thermal capacity)
Finally, welcome to modify the formula or add formula!
Method of efficient Smilesadness:
Introduction: This method only calculates the result of incorrect power generation when mixed with uranium MOX mixing and uranium mixing
Parameter: Efficiency n: It is related to several directions (up and down, left and right, one direction +1) with a fuel rod/reflective board in the four directions of the four directions, and the value is available.1-7.
Baseball M: How much is the connection, a single stick, 1 double stick, 2 four sticks 4.
Total power generation of uranium rod = 5 [n grid A × m grid A +n grid B × m grid B +...]
Total fever of uranium rod = 2n grid A (n grid A +1) m grid B +2n grid B (N grid B +1) m grid B+…
Mox Total Power Generation = Total Power Generation of Uranium Baseballs such as structures × (1+4 × current temperature/explosion temperature)
Mox's total fever in nuclear power = uranium rods such as the structure of the structure of the structure
Mox's total heating in thermal nucleus = such as uranium rods such as the structure of the structure, but it has changed to 2 times after the accumulation temperature rises to a certain extent (I will not see the source code I don’t know how much)SUB> GT 把: Change the coefficient of power generation 5 to 1, and the heating coefficient 2 can be changed to 0.5.
True algorithm: Calculate uranium MOX mixed and uranium mixed power generation can calculate the correct answer, thank you for the feedback of those players who use uranium mixed.
Parameters: Bats M: Old rules.
Efficiency N: How many fuel rods are up and down, left, left, left and right (how much is the reflective board?Baseball 3), so now N can be score (a single rod four -stick n = 3.25 next to a single stick, full four sticks on all sides N = 17)
Bring this N into the formula of the calculation of the power generation, the total power generation should be consistent with the results of the simulator. The power -based fuel rod power generation should be consistent with the simulator.
Don't use the real algorithm to calculate heat!
Don't use the real algorithm to calculate heat!
After lift some simple chestnuts, you can find that the difference between the two algorithms comes from only one beautiful error:
The increase in power generation is wrong.
However, if you can only get the correct answer with only the same type of real and fake algorithm, and the real algorithm calculation is complicated and not fever, I suggest:
If the algorithm can't count, don't use the real algorithm.
